The clash of practice: political controversy and the United Nations Peacebuilding commission

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The clash of practice : political controversy and the United Nations Peacebuilding commission. / Bueger, Christian.

I: Evidence and Policy, Bind 7, Nr. 2, 01.05.2011, s. 171-191.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Bueger, C 2011, 'The clash of practice: political controversy and the United Nations Peacebuilding commission', Evidence and Policy, bind 7, nr. 2, s. 171-191. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426411X579216

APA

Bueger, C. (2011). The clash of practice: political controversy and the United Nations Peacebuilding commission. Evidence and Policy, 7(2), 171-191. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426411X579216

Vancouver

Bueger C. The clash of practice: political controversy and the United Nations Peacebuilding commission. Evidence and Policy. 2011 maj 1;7(2):171-191. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426411X579216

Author

Bueger, Christian. / The clash of practice : political controversy and the United Nations Peacebuilding commission. I: Evidence and Policy. 2011 ; Bind 7, Nr. 2. s. 171-191.

Bibtex

@article{f9cdd1eb44b044b6ac5606ae9d233708,
title = "The clash of practice: political controversy and the United Nations Peacebuilding commission",
abstract = "Controversy is at the heart of politics. Theories of practice offer a productive way of understanding controversies and potentially negotiating in them. In this paper, drawing on the work of Theodore Schatzki, Michel Callon and Bruno Latour, I introduce a heuristic for understanding controversies. I argue that what is often at stake in controversies are different types of practices of how a political issue should be handled. I introduce five of these types of practices. I analyse a case from global politics to demonstrate the value of such a perspective – the controversies in the United Nations Peacebuilding Commission are analysed as clashes between different practices of handling peacebuilding.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, international organisations, peacebuilding, political controversy, practice theory",
author = "Christian Bueger",
year = "2011",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1332/174426411X579216",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "171--191",
journal = "Evidence and Policy",
issn = "1744-2648",
publisher = "Policy Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The clash of practice

T2 - political controversy and the United Nations Peacebuilding commission

AU - Bueger, Christian

PY - 2011/5/1

Y1 - 2011/5/1

N2 - Controversy is at the heart of politics. Theories of practice offer a productive way of understanding controversies and potentially negotiating in them. In this paper, drawing on the work of Theodore Schatzki, Michel Callon and Bruno Latour, I introduce a heuristic for understanding controversies. I argue that what is often at stake in controversies are different types of practices of how a political issue should be handled. I introduce five of these types of practices. I analyse a case from global politics to demonstrate the value of such a perspective – the controversies in the United Nations Peacebuilding Commission are analysed as clashes between different practices of handling peacebuilding.

AB - Controversy is at the heart of politics. Theories of practice offer a productive way of understanding controversies and potentially negotiating in them. In this paper, drawing on the work of Theodore Schatzki, Michel Callon and Bruno Latour, I introduce a heuristic for understanding controversies. I argue that what is often at stake in controversies are different types of practices of how a political issue should be handled. I introduce five of these types of practices. I analyse a case from global politics to demonstrate the value of such a perspective – the controversies in the United Nations Peacebuilding Commission are analysed as clashes between different practices of handling peacebuilding.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - international organisations

KW - peacebuilding

KW - political controversy

KW - practice theory

U2 - 10.1332/174426411X579216

DO - 10.1332/174426411X579216

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 171

EP - 191

JO - Evidence and Policy

JF - Evidence and Policy

SN - 1744-2648

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 209142753