DHA and improvement of memory function: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006: (Scientific Opinion)

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelRådgivningfagfællebedømt

Standard

DHA and improvement of memory function: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 : (Scientific Opinion). / EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA).

I: E F S A Journal, Bind 14, Nr. 5, 4455, 02.05.2016.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelRådgivningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) 2016, 'DHA and improvement of memory function: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006: (Scientific Opinion)', E F S A Journal, bind 14, nr. 5, 4455. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4455

APA

EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) (2016). DHA and improvement of memory function: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006: (Scientific Opinion). E F S A Journal, 14(5), [4455]. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4455

Vancouver

EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). DHA and improvement of memory function: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006: (Scientific Opinion). E F S A Journal. 2016 maj 2;14(5). 4455. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4455

Author

EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). / DHA and improvement of memory function: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 : (Scientific Opinion). I: E F S A Journal. 2016 ; Bind 14, Nr. 5.

Bibtex

@article{f23e50fbab214bd188671aee6e52be7c,
title = "DHA and improvement of memory function: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006: (Scientific Opinion)",
abstract = "Following an application from DSM Nutritional Products, submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of the United Kingdom, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver anopinion on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and improvement of memory function. DHA is sufficiently characterised. An improvement of memory function is a beneficial physiological effect. In weighing the evidence, the Panel took into account that,out of the 11 human intervention studies from which conclusions can be drawn for the scientific substantiation of the claim, two studies showed a beneficial effect of DHA supplementation on memory function, one study showed inconsistent results, one study showed a negative effect of DHA on memory function and seven studies did not show an effect of DHA on memory outcomes. The Panel considers that the majority of the human intervention studies provided did not show an effect of DHA supplementation on memory, and that the conflicting results across studies cannot be explained by differences in the study design, the source of DHA, the DHA dose, the baseline characteristics of the subjects recruited, or the duration of the studies. The Panel also took into account that the metaanalyses of intervention studies submitted by the applicant do not provide evidence for an effect of DHA on memory function, and that the three observational studies from which conclusions could be drawn for the scientific substantiation of the claim do not provide evidence for an association between dietary DHA and memory function. The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of DHA and an improvement of memory function.",
keywords = "Faculty of Science, DHA, Fish oil, Memory, Cognitive function, Health claims",
author = "{EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)} and Sj{\"o}din, {Anders Mikael}",
note = "EFSA 2016 4455",
year = "2016",
month = may,
day = "2",
doi = "10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4455",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "E F S A Journal",
issn = "1831-4732",
publisher = "European Food Safety Authority (E F S A)",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - DHA and improvement of memory function: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006

T2 - (Scientific Opinion)

AU - EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)

AU - Sjödin, Anders Mikael

N1 - EFSA 2016 4455

PY - 2016/5/2

Y1 - 2016/5/2

N2 - Following an application from DSM Nutritional Products, submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of the United Kingdom, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver anopinion on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and improvement of memory function. DHA is sufficiently characterised. An improvement of memory function is a beneficial physiological effect. In weighing the evidence, the Panel took into account that,out of the 11 human intervention studies from which conclusions can be drawn for the scientific substantiation of the claim, two studies showed a beneficial effect of DHA supplementation on memory function, one study showed inconsistent results, one study showed a negative effect of DHA on memory function and seven studies did not show an effect of DHA on memory outcomes. The Panel considers that the majority of the human intervention studies provided did not show an effect of DHA supplementation on memory, and that the conflicting results across studies cannot be explained by differences in the study design, the source of DHA, the DHA dose, the baseline characteristics of the subjects recruited, or the duration of the studies. The Panel also took into account that the metaanalyses of intervention studies submitted by the applicant do not provide evidence for an effect of DHA on memory function, and that the three observational studies from which conclusions could be drawn for the scientific substantiation of the claim do not provide evidence for an association between dietary DHA and memory function. The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of DHA and an improvement of memory function.

AB - Following an application from DSM Nutritional Products, submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of the United Kingdom, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver anopinion on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and improvement of memory function. DHA is sufficiently characterised. An improvement of memory function is a beneficial physiological effect. In weighing the evidence, the Panel took into account that,out of the 11 human intervention studies from which conclusions can be drawn for the scientific substantiation of the claim, two studies showed a beneficial effect of DHA supplementation on memory function, one study showed inconsistent results, one study showed a negative effect of DHA on memory function and seven studies did not show an effect of DHA on memory outcomes. The Panel considers that the majority of the human intervention studies provided did not show an effect of DHA supplementation on memory, and that the conflicting results across studies cannot be explained by differences in the study design, the source of DHA, the DHA dose, the baseline characteristics of the subjects recruited, or the duration of the studies. The Panel also took into account that the metaanalyses of intervention studies submitted by the applicant do not provide evidence for an effect of DHA on memory function, and that the three observational studies from which conclusions could be drawn for the scientific substantiation of the claim do not provide evidence for an association between dietary DHA and memory function. The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of DHA and an improvement of memory function.

KW - Faculty of Science

KW - DHA

KW - Fish oil

KW - Memory

KW - Cognitive function

KW - Health claims

U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4455

DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4455

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

JO - E F S A Journal

JF - E F S A Journal

SN - 1831-4732

IS - 5

M1 - 4455

ER -

ID: 187630092