Automation, Biocrats, and Imaginaries in Biometric Border Worlds: A Commentary

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Automation, Biocrats, and Imaginaries in Biometric Border Worlds : A Commentary. / Whyte, Zachary.

I: Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology, Bind 87, Nr. 2, 2022, s. 338-346.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Whyte, Z 2022, 'Automation, Biocrats, and Imaginaries in Biometric Border Worlds: A Commentary', Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology, bind 87, nr. 2, s. 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2020.1736595

APA

Whyte, Z. (2022). Automation, Biocrats, and Imaginaries in Biometric Border Worlds: A Commentary. Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology, 87(2), 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2020.1736595

Vancouver

Whyte Z. Automation, Biocrats, and Imaginaries in Biometric Border Worlds: A Commentary. Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology. 2022;87(2): 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2020.1736595

Author

Whyte, Zachary. / Automation, Biocrats, and Imaginaries in Biometric Border Worlds : A Commentary. I: Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology. 2022 ; Bind 87, Nr. 2. s. 338-346.

Bibtex

@article{22fd3c4055be48299476a972f4db0596,
title = "Automation, Biocrats, and Imaginaries in Biometric Border Worlds: A Commentary",
abstract = "This commentary reflects on the special issue on ethnographic approaches to biometric technologies. By attending to everyday experiences and understandings of the production, use, and contestation of biometric border technologies, the articles show how they are enmeshed in much wider social and cultural networks than is often presumed. I draw out three themes from the articles: automation, biometric bureaucrats (here glossed as {\textquoteleft}biocrats{\textquoteright}), and imaginaries. While biometric technologies are often presented as automatic, they regularly fail. And though their automation may seem to shift questions of responsibility, they equally structure ways in which situated actors understand and act around issues of responsibility. While biometric border technologies are commonly seen to be aimed exclusively at the bodies of migrants, the bodies of biocrats are also fundamentally implicated. Lastly, while biometric technologies are presented as dealing with bodily characteristics based on science and rationality, they also relate to social and cultural imaginaries.",
author = "Zachary Whyte",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1080/00141844.2020.1736595",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = " 338--346",
journal = "Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology",
issn = "1469-588X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automation, Biocrats, and Imaginaries in Biometric Border Worlds

T2 - A Commentary

AU - Whyte, Zachary

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - This commentary reflects on the special issue on ethnographic approaches to biometric technologies. By attending to everyday experiences and understandings of the production, use, and contestation of biometric border technologies, the articles show how they are enmeshed in much wider social and cultural networks than is often presumed. I draw out three themes from the articles: automation, biometric bureaucrats (here glossed as ‘biocrats’), and imaginaries. While biometric technologies are often presented as automatic, they regularly fail. And though their automation may seem to shift questions of responsibility, they equally structure ways in which situated actors understand and act around issues of responsibility. While biometric border technologies are commonly seen to be aimed exclusively at the bodies of migrants, the bodies of biocrats are also fundamentally implicated. Lastly, while biometric technologies are presented as dealing with bodily characteristics based on science and rationality, they also relate to social and cultural imaginaries.

AB - This commentary reflects on the special issue on ethnographic approaches to biometric technologies. By attending to everyday experiences and understandings of the production, use, and contestation of biometric border technologies, the articles show how they are enmeshed in much wider social and cultural networks than is often presumed. I draw out three themes from the articles: automation, biometric bureaucrats (here glossed as ‘biocrats’), and imaginaries. While biometric technologies are often presented as automatic, they regularly fail. And though their automation may seem to shift questions of responsibility, they equally structure ways in which situated actors understand and act around issues of responsibility. While biometric border technologies are commonly seen to be aimed exclusively at the bodies of migrants, the bodies of biocrats are also fundamentally implicated. Lastly, while biometric technologies are presented as dealing with bodily characteristics based on science and rationality, they also relate to social and cultural imaginaries.

U2 - 10.1080/00141844.2020.1736595

DO - 10.1080/00141844.2020.1736595

M3 - Journal article

VL - 87

SP - 338

EP - 346

JO - Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology

JF - Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology

SN - 1469-588X

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 238427014