A survey of expert views on misinformation: Definitions, determinants, solutions, and future of the field

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

A survey of expert views on misinformation : Definitions, determinants, solutions, and future of the field. / Altay, Sacha ; Berriche, Manon ; Heuer, Hendrik ; Farkas, Johan; Rathje, Steven .

I: Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, Bind 4, Nr. 4, 2023, s. 1-34.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Altay, S, Berriche, M, Heuer, H, Farkas, J & Rathje, S 2023, 'A survey of expert views on misinformation: Definitions, determinants, solutions, and future of the field', Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, bind 4, nr. 4, s. 1-34. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-119

APA

Altay, S., Berriche, M., Heuer, H., Farkas, J., & Rathje, S. (2023). A survey of expert views on misinformation: Definitions, determinants, solutions, and future of the field. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 4(4), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-119

Vancouver

Altay S, Berriche M, Heuer H, Farkas J, Rathje S. A survey of expert views on misinformation: Definitions, determinants, solutions, and future of the field. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. 2023;4(4):1-34. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-119

Author

Altay, Sacha ; Berriche, Manon ; Heuer, Hendrik ; Farkas, Johan ; Rathje, Steven . / A survey of expert views on misinformation : Definitions, determinants, solutions, and future of the field. I: Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. 2023 ; Bind 4, Nr. 4. s. 1-34.

Bibtex

@article{68d6728cd8254c1eb8ee4f84f9b4dc24,
title = "A survey of expert views on misinformation: Definitions, determinants, solutions, and future of the field",
abstract = "We surveyed 150 academic experts on misinformation and identified areas of expert consensus. Expertsdefined misinformation as false and misleading information, though views diverged on the importance ofintentionality and what exactly constitutes misinformation. The most popular reason why people believeand share misinformation was partisanship, while lack of education was one of the least popular reasons.Experts were optimistic about the effectiveness of interventions against misinformation and supportedsystem-level actions against misinformation, such as platform design changes and algorithmic changes.The most agreed-upon future direction for the field of misinformation was to collect more data outside ofthe United States.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, misnformation, desinformation, disinformation, fake news, digitale medier, sociale medier, falske nyheder, tech regulering, tech, Faculty of Social Sciences, misinformation, desinformation, fake news, falske nyheder, tech regulering, sociale medier",
author = "Sacha Altay and Manon Berriche and Hendrik Heuer and Johan Farkas and Steven Rathje",
year = "2023",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-119",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "1--34",
journal = "Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A survey of expert views on misinformation

T2 - Definitions, determinants, solutions, and future of the field

AU - Altay, Sacha

AU - Berriche, Manon

AU - Heuer, Hendrik

AU - Farkas, Johan

AU - Rathje, Steven

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - We surveyed 150 academic experts on misinformation and identified areas of expert consensus. Expertsdefined misinformation as false and misleading information, though views diverged on the importance ofintentionality and what exactly constitutes misinformation. The most popular reason why people believeand share misinformation was partisanship, while lack of education was one of the least popular reasons.Experts were optimistic about the effectiveness of interventions against misinformation and supportedsystem-level actions against misinformation, such as platform design changes and algorithmic changes.The most agreed-upon future direction for the field of misinformation was to collect more data outside ofthe United States.

AB - We surveyed 150 academic experts on misinformation and identified areas of expert consensus. Expertsdefined misinformation as false and misleading information, though views diverged on the importance ofintentionality and what exactly constitutes misinformation. The most popular reason why people believeand share misinformation was partisanship, while lack of education was one of the least popular reasons.Experts were optimistic about the effectiveness of interventions against misinformation and supportedsystem-level actions against misinformation, such as platform design changes and algorithmic changes.The most agreed-upon future direction for the field of misinformation was to collect more data outside ofthe United States.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - misnformation

KW - desinformation

KW - disinformation

KW - fake news

KW - digitale medier

KW - sociale medier

KW - falske nyheder

KW - tech regulering

KW - tech

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - misinformation

KW - desinformation

KW - fake news

KW - falske nyheder

KW - tech regulering

KW - sociale medier

U2 - https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-119

DO - https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-119

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 1

EP - 34

JO - Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review

JF - Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 360601086