On history and authority: the Cold War nuclear arms race and its importance for critical security theory

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

On history and authority: the Cold War nuclear arms race and its importance for critical security theory. / van Munster, Rens; Sylvest, Casper.

I: Critical Studies on Security, Bind 10, Nr. 3, 2022, s. 157-171.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

van Munster, R & Sylvest, C 2022, 'On history and authority: the Cold War nuclear arms race and its importance for critical security theory', Critical Studies on Security, bind 10, nr. 3, s. 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2023.2167773

APA

van Munster, R., & Sylvest, C. (2022). On history and authority: the Cold War nuclear arms race and its importance for critical security theory. Critical Studies on Security, 10(3), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2023.2167773

Vancouver

van Munster R, Sylvest C. On history and authority: the Cold War nuclear arms race and its importance for critical security theory. Critical Studies on Security. 2022;10(3):157-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2023.2167773

Author

van Munster, Rens ; Sylvest, Casper. / On history and authority: the Cold War nuclear arms race and its importance for critical security theory. I: Critical Studies on Security. 2022 ; Bind 10, Nr. 3. s. 157-171.

Bibtex

@article{7866a26c13494f4db879faac2008327f,
title = "On history and authority: the Cold War nuclear arms race and its importance for critical security theory",
abstract = "Since the late 1990s, the critical study of security has crystallised into a professional field of study–Critical Security Studies (CSS)–complete with theoretical schools, journals, and disciplinary narratives that recount its birth and development. The establishment of CSS as a separate field of inquiry distinct from conventional approaches to security is a remarkable achievement but has also come at a price. We argue that this is especially apparent in relation to the limited role Cold War history plays in CSS. Disciplinary narratives of the field tend to conflate the Cold War period with conventional security theory or strategic studies, thus downplaying the originality and importance of critical perspectives articulated during this protracted conflict. Emphasising the deep entanglements of the Cold War nuclear arms race with questions of ecological contamination, democracy, race, and decolonisation, we argue that these intersections are worth revisiting as intellectual precursors and foundations for CSS. We briefly illustrate this argument by highlighting important challenges to conventional security thinking that were formulated at three interconnected sites during the early Cold War: the 1955 Bandung Conference, Pan-African resistance to French nuclear testing in Algeria, and African-American anti-nuclear activism.",
author = "{van Munster}, Rens and Casper Sylvest",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1080/21624887.2023.2167773",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "157--171",
journal = "Critical Studies on Security",
issn = "2162-4887",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - On history and authority: the Cold War nuclear arms race and its importance for critical security theory

AU - van Munster, Rens

AU - Sylvest, Casper

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Since the late 1990s, the critical study of security has crystallised into a professional field of study–Critical Security Studies (CSS)–complete with theoretical schools, journals, and disciplinary narratives that recount its birth and development. The establishment of CSS as a separate field of inquiry distinct from conventional approaches to security is a remarkable achievement but has also come at a price. We argue that this is especially apparent in relation to the limited role Cold War history plays in CSS. Disciplinary narratives of the field tend to conflate the Cold War period with conventional security theory or strategic studies, thus downplaying the originality and importance of critical perspectives articulated during this protracted conflict. Emphasising the deep entanglements of the Cold War nuclear arms race with questions of ecological contamination, democracy, race, and decolonisation, we argue that these intersections are worth revisiting as intellectual precursors and foundations for CSS. We briefly illustrate this argument by highlighting important challenges to conventional security thinking that were formulated at three interconnected sites during the early Cold War: the 1955 Bandung Conference, Pan-African resistance to French nuclear testing in Algeria, and African-American anti-nuclear activism.

AB - Since the late 1990s, the critical study of security has crystallised into a professional field of study–Critical Security Studies (CSS)–complete with theoretical schools, journals, and disciplinary narratives that recount its birth and development. The establishment of CSS as a separate field of inquiry distinct from conventional approaches to security is a remarkable achievement but has also come at a price. We argue that this is especially apparent in relation to the limited role Cold War history plays in CSS. Disciplinary narratives of the field tend to conflate the Cold War period with conventional security theory or strategic studies, thus downplaying the originality and importance of critical perspectives articulated during this protracted conflict. Emphasising the deep entanglements of the Cold War nuclear arms race with questions of ecological contamination, democracy, race, and decolonisation, we argue that these intersections are worth revisiting as intellectual precursors and foundations for CSS. We briefly illustrate this argument by highlighting important challenges to conventional security thinking that were formulated at three interconnected sites during the early Cold War: the 1955 Bandung Conference, Pan-African resistance to French nuclear testing in Algeria, and African-American anti-nuclear activism.

U2 - 10.1080/21624887.2023.2167773

DO - 10.1080/21624887.2023.2167773

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 157

EP - 171

JO - Critical Studies on Security

JF - Critical Studies on Security

SN - 2162-4887

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 371691201