The scale of hospital production in different settings: one size does not fit all

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

The scale of hospital production in different settings : one size does not fit all. / Asmild, Mette; Hollingsworth, Bruce ; Birch, Stephen.

I: Journal of Productivity Analysis, Bind 40, Nr. 2, 2013, s. 197–206.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Asmild, M, Hollingsworth, B & Birch, S 2013, 'The scale of hospital production in different settings: one size does not fit all', Journal of Productivity Analysis, bind 40, nr. 2, s. 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-012-0332-9

APA

Asmild, M., Hollingsworth, B., & Birch, S. (2013). The scale of hospital production in different settings: one size does not fit all. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 40(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-012-0332-9

Vancouver

Asmild M, Hollingsworth B, Birch S. The scale of hospital production in different settings: one size does not fit all. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2013;40(2):197–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-012-0332-9

Author

Asmild, Mette ; Hollingsworth, Bruce ; Birch, Stephen. / The scale of hospital production in different settings : one size does not fit all. I: Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2013 ; Bind 40, Nr. 2. s. 197–206.

Bibtex

@article{12a60ce8e6184f4aa809be4db937a1be,
title = "The scale of hospital production in different settings: one size does not fit all",
abstract = "This paper analyses the productive efficiency of 141 public hospitals from 1998-2004 in two Canadian provinces; one a small province with a few small cities and a generally more rural population and the other a large province that is more urban in nature, with a population who mainly live in large cities. The relative efficiencies of the hospitals, the changes in productivity during this time period, and the relationship between efficiency and the size or scale of the hospitals are investigated using data envelopment analysis. The models for the production of health care use case mix adjusted hospital discharges as the output, and nursing hours as inputs. We find clear differences between the two provinces. Making use of {\textquoteleft}own{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}meta{\textquoteright} technical efficiency frontiers, we demonstrate that efficient units in the larger and more urban province are larger than non-efficient units in that province. However, efficient hospitals in the smaller and more rural province are smaller than non-efficient hospitals in that province. Overall, efficient hospitals in the larger more urban province are larger than efficient hospitals in the smaller more rural province. This has interesting policy implications - different hospitals may have different optimal sizes, or different efficient modes of operation, depending on location, the population they serve, and the policies their respective provincial governments wish to implement. In addition, there are lessons to be learned by comparing the hospitals across the two provinces, since the inefficient hospitals in the small rural province predominantly use hospitals from the large urban province as benchmarks, such that substantially larger improvement potential can be identified by inter-provincial rather than intra-provincial benchmarking analysis. ",
keywords = "Former LIFE faculty, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Scale, Efficiency, Hospitals, Provinces",
author = "Mette Asmild and Bruce Hollingsworth and Stephen Birch",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s11123-012-0332-9",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "197–206",
journal = "Journal of Productivity Analysis",
issn = "0895-562X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The scale of hospital production in different settings

T2 - one size does not fit all

AU - Asmild, Mette

AU - Hollingsworth, Bruce

AU - Birch, Stephen

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper analyses the productive efficiency of 141 public hospitals from 1998-2004 in two Canadian provinces; one a small province with a few small cities and a generally more rural population and the other a large province that is more urban in nature, with a population who mainly live in large cities. The relative efficiencies of the hospitals, the changes in productivity during this time period, and the relationship between efficiency and the size or scale of the hospitals are investigated using data envelopment analysis. The models for the production of health care use case mix adjusted hospital discharges as the output, and nursing hours as inputs. We find clear differences between the two provinces. Making use of ‘own’ and ‘meta’ technical efficiency frontiers, we demonstrate that efficient units in the larger and more urban province are larger than non-efficient units in that province. However, efficient hospitals in the smaller and more rural province are smaller than non-efficient hospitals in that province. Overall, efficient hospitals in the larger more urban province are larger than efficient hospitals in the smaller more rural province. This has interesting policy implications - different hospitals may have different optimal sizes, or different efficient modes of operation, depending on location, the population they serve, and the policies their respective provincial governments wish to implement. In addition, there are lessons to be learned by comparing the hospitals across the two provinces, since the inefficient hospitals in the small rural province predominantly use hospitals from the large urban province as benchmarks, such that substantially larger improvement potential can be identified by inter-provincial rather than intra-provincial benchmarking analysis.

AB - This paper analyses the productive efficiency of 141 public hospitals from 1998-2004 in two Canadian provinces; one a small province with a few small cities and a generally more rural population and the other a large province that is more urban in nature, with a population who mainly live in large cities. The relative efficiencies of the hospitals, the changes in productivity during this time period, and the relationship between efficiency and the size or scale of the hospitals are investigated using data envelopment analysis. The models for the production of health care use case mix adjusted hospital discharges as the output, and nursing hours as inputs. We find clear differences between the two provinces. Making use of ‘own’ and ‘meta’ technical efficiency frontiers, we demonstrate that efficient units in the larger and more urban province are larger than non-efficient units in that province. However, efficient hospitals in the smaller and more rural province are smaller than non-efficient hospitals in that province. Overall, efficient hospitals in the larger more urban province are larger than efficient hospitals in the smaller more rural province. This has interesting policy implications - different hospitals may have different optimal sizes, or different efficient modes of operation, depending on location, the population they serve, and the policies their respective provincial governments wish to implement. In addition, there are lessons to be learned by comparing the hospitals across the two provinces, since the inefficient hospitals in the small rural province predominantly use hospitals from the large urban province as benchmarks, such that substantially larger improvement potential can be identified by inter-provincial rather than intra-provincial benchmarking analysis.

KW - Former LIFE faculty

KW - Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Scale, Efficiency, Hospitals, Provinces

U2 - 10.1007/s11123-012-0332-9

DO - 10.1007/s11123-012-0332-9

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 197

EP - 206

JO - Journal of Productivity Analysis

JF - Journal of Productivity Analysis

SN - 0895-562X

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 40869394